A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Enhancing MRI efficiency in musculoskeletal examinations: Impact of optimized facility design and workflow optimization efforts. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: To assess the workflow efficiency of an optimized MRI facility design compared to conventional facilities.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 7,164 non-contrast MRI examinations (3,951 knee, 2,246 shoulder, 967 ankle) performed between January 2021 and April 2024. We compared an optimized facility (OF) featuring three scanners, three dedicated preparation bays, and dockable tables to two reference facilities (RF) with traditional single-scanner/single-table setups. All scans were performed on 3 T scanners. Workflow metrics were extracted from scanner logs and electronic health records. Three-way ANOVA and chi-square tests assessed the impact of facility design, body region, and date on workflow metrics.

Results: The OF demonstrated a decrease of the mean total process cycle by 5.0-6.8 min (16.4-18.9 %) compared to RF (p < 0.001), which was primarily attributed to reduced turnaround times (mean reduction: 4.2 min, p < 0.001). Scans incorporating deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction showed 4.9-6.2 min shorter mean acquisition times at both facilities (p < 0.001). The mean time interval from patient arrival to exam start was 6.6 min shorter at OF, and on-time performance was higher at OF (79.4 %) versus RF (63.4 %) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that optimized MRI facility design significantly enhances outpatient efficiency and increases patient throughput for non-contrast enhanced musculoskeletal examinations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112263DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facility design
12
optimized facility
8
enhancing mri
4
mri efficiency
4
efficiency musculoskeletal
4
musculoskeletal examinations
4
examinations impact
4
impact optimized
4
facility
4
workflow
4

Similar Publications