A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Accuracy of intracranial pressure assessment with a non-invasive transcranial doppler and arterial blood pressure method in patients with suspected idiopathic intracranial hypertension. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has nearly doubled in the recent decade, possibly due to increasing obesity rates. Lumbar puncture pressure (LPP) assessment is still the diagnostic gold standard but due to invasiveness of the method, several non-invasive alternatives exist. We evaluated a non-invasive intracranial pressure (nICP) method for its accuracy to predict LPP.

Methods: Prospectively, we included patients with suspected IIH and obtained nICP by means of a combined bilateral transcranial Doppler and photoplethysmographic arterial blood pressure method. In addition, we searched for an empty sella sign by magnetic resonance tomography and evaluated the optical nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) bilaterally by Duplex sonography. We analyzed data on an individual level for their capability to predict LPP. Included were 70 patients from which 60 with a complete data set were used for further evaluation. Patients with symptomatic intracranial pressure were excluded.

Results: The nICP and LPP correlated with  = 0.85 on the right, and  = 0.79 on the left side ( < 0.001, respectively). The mean difference of nICP-LPP was 0.45 ± 4.93 cmHO. Its sensitivity to predict an increased ICP was 0.92, the specificity was 0.88 and negative predictive value 0.88. The empty sella sign and the ONSD showed no significant correlation to the LPP.

Conclusion: The nICP method allows pre-diagnosis of increased ICP and might help in decision making for the need of LPP. Due to the moderately increased ICP levels, ONSD remained insignificant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205115PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00434-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracranial pressure
12
transcranial doppler
8
arterial blood
8
blood pressure
8
pressure method
8
patients suspected
8
idiopathic intracranial
8
intracranial hypertension
8
included patients
8
pressure
6

Similar Publications