Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Inconsistent responses to increased flow rates have been observed in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy, with a significant minority in two recent studies exhibiting increased respiratory effort at higher flow rates. Digital twins of patients receiving HFNC could help understand the physiological basis for differing responses.
Methods: Patient data were collated from previous studies in AHRF patients who were continuously monitored with electrical impedance tomography and oesophageal manometry and received HFNC at flow rates of 30, 40 or 45 L/min. Patients, based on their responses to an increase in flow rate to 60 L/min, were categorised into two groups: five responders with reduced oesophageal pressure swings ΔP (- 3.1 cmHO on average), and five non-responders with increased ΔP (+ 2.0 cmHO on average). Two cohorts of digital twins were created based on these data using a multi-compartmental mechanistic cardiopulmonary simulator. Digital twins' responses to increased HFNC flow rates (60 L/min) were simulated with constant respiratory effort to assess changes in gas exchange and lung mechanics, and with varying respiratory effort to quantify their combined effects on lung mechanics and P-SILI indicators.
Results: The digital twins accurately replicated patient-specific responses at all flow rates. Responder digital twins showed a mean 20 mL/cmHO increase in lung compliance at higher flow rates, versus a 6 mL/cmHO decrease in compliance with non-responders. In digital twins of responders versus non-responders, increased flow rates produced a mean change in lung stress of - 1.5 versus + 1.2 cmHO, in dynamic lung strain of - 8.8 versus + 16.4%, in driving pressure of - 1.3 versus + 1.1 cmHO, and in mechanical power of - 0.8 versus + 1.2 J/min. Higher flow rate dependent positive end-expiratory pressure in digital twins of non-responders did not cause recruitment, and reduced tidal volumes due to higher functional residual capacities-to compensate for the resulting worsened gas-exchange, non-responders increased their respiratory effort, in turn increasing patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) indicators. In digital twins of responders, reductions in tidal volumes due to higher FRCs resulting from increased PEEP were outweighed by alveolar recruitment. This increased compliance and improved gas exchange, permitting reduced respiratory effort and decreases in P-SILI indicators.
Conclusions: Failure to reduce spontaneous respiratory efforts in response to increased HFNC flow rates could be due to a deterioration in lung mechanics, with an attendant risk of P-SILI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202274 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00773-5 | DOI Listing |