A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Evaluating real-world performance of an automated offline glaucoma AI on a smartphone fundus camera across glaucoma severity stages. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Leveraging an artificial intelligence system (AI) for glaucoma screening can mitigate the current challenges and provide prompt detection and management crucial in averting irreversible blindness. The study reports the real-world performance of a glaucoma AI system deployed on a smartphone-based fundus camera across various severities of glaucoma.

Methods: In this prospective comparative study at a tertiary care glaucoma clinic, consecutive patients were evaluated by a glaucoma specialist using clinical assessment, visual field tests, and SD-OCT, and categorized as definite glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or no glaucoma. For glaucoma patients, severity was determined using Hoddap-Parrish-Anderson criteria based on visual field mean deviation (MD). A disc-centered image per eye was captured using a validated portable non-mydriatic fundus camera. The AI tool's ability to detect referral-warranted glaucoma (glaucoma and glaucoma suspects) versus no glaucoma was compared to the specialist's diagnosis.

Results: We included 213 participants with a mean age of 55 ± 14.7 years (18, 88). The glaucoma specialist diagnosed 129 subjects as definite glaucoma (early-23, moderate-31, severe-75), 33-disc suspects and 51 as no-glaucoma. The automated AI system based on fundus images achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 92.02%, sensitivity of 91.36% (95%CI 85.93% to 95.19%) and specificity of 94.12% (83.76% to 98.77%) for referral warranted glaucoma. The 14 false negatives included 5-disc suspects and 9 definite glaucoma (3-early, 3-moderate and 3-advanced glaucoma). The sensitivity of AI for detecting early, moderate and advanced glaucoma was 86.9% (95%CI 66.4-97.2), 90.3% (95%CI 74.3-97.96), and 96% (88.75% to 99.17%) respectively.

Conclusion: In a real-world setting, the AI-based offline tool integrated on a smartphone fundus camera showed a promising performance in detecting referral-warranted glaucoma compared to a glaucoma specialist's diagnosis. The AI showed higher accuracy in detecting advanced glaucoma followed by moderate and early glaucoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200649PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324883PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glaucoma
24
fundus camera
16
glaucoma glaucoma
16
definite glaucoma
12
real-world performance
8
smartphone fundus
8
glaucoma specialist
8
visual field
8
referral-warranted glaucoma
8
glaucoma compared
8

Similar Publications