Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The Challenge Point Framework (CPF) guides practice design for optimal motor skill learning. The CPF's use and prevalence has not been reported. This review's aims are to - (i) identify research areas that use the CPF, (ii) determine the CPF's prevalence across research areas and (iii) summarise applications of the CPF across research areas. A systematic scoping review, following modified PRISMA-ScR guidelines, was conducted. Papers referencing Guadagnoli and Lee's (2004) "Challenge Point Framework" paper were reviewed against inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data from 100 included papers were analysed for (1) numerical; (2) thematic; and (3) descriptive summaries. Four themes were identified and common CPF applications were identified within each theme. CPF use has been viewed favourably whilst its limitations have been acknowledged (e.g., lack of practical application research).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2508283 | DOI Listing |