Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: Vaccinations are essential to ensure protection for healthcare professionals, patients and communities. However, vaccination hesitancy has been reported among healthcare professionals. Nurses are the main, first and direct point of contact for patients and citizens in most healthcare services, but only a minority of studies investigated vaccination hesitancy and uptake specifically in this population. Thus, this study aimed to explore the determinants and motivations of vaccination hesitancy and uptake among nurses.

Design: Systematic review with a narrative synthesis approach.

Methods: We included primary research exploring determinants or motivations of vaccination hesitancy or uptake among nurses. No time or geographical limit was applied. Generalised random-effects linear models with a logit link were used to calculate the pooled estimated proportions for vaccine uptake among nurses.

Data Sources: We explored nine databases (2023).

Results: The initial search identified 3452 records; 42 records were eventually included in this review. Older age, longer professional experience, lack of confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and cost associated with the vaccine were among the most common determinants of vaccine hesitancy. Safety concerns, complacency (e.g., beliefs of not needing the vaccine), and accessibility (e.g., logistics) were among the most common motivations for being vaccine hesitant. Having strong confidence in the vaccine, a high sense of collective responsibility, previous vaccination uptake/positive intentions towards future vaccination, weaker vaccine complacency, and older age were among the most common determinants of vaccine uptake. Willingness to protect themselves and/or others, contribute to the herd immunity, and comply with recommendations were among the most common motivations for vaccine uptake. The pooled prevalence of influenza vaccine uptake among nurses was 44% (95% CI: 35-73).

Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review with meta-analysis could guide the identification of strategies to reduce barriers and further improve facilitators to eventually increase vaccine uptake in nurses.

Implications For The Profession And/or Patient Care: This study contributes to further understanding nurses' beliefs, barriers, and facilitators towards vaccination. By doing so, these results could guide the identification of strategies to reduce barriers and further improve facilitators to eventually increase vaccine uptake in nurses.

Reporting Method: We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, in particular to the PRISMA checklist.

Patient Or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42020212252.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409242PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17852DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vaccine uptake
24
vaccination hesitancy
20
hesitancy uptake
16
vaccine
13
determinants motivations
12
motivations vaccination
12
uptake nurses
12
systematic review
12
uptake
10
vaccination
8

Similar Publications

Background: Among pregnant and postpartum women, decision-making for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is influenced by vaccine safety concerns, misconceptions, shifting vaccine policies, and exclusion in the initial vaccine rollout. This caused confusion and vaccine hesitancy among many groups including pregnant and postpartum women.

Objective: The objective of this study was to understand the multilevel factors that influence vaccine decision-making among pregnant and postpartum women in Pakistan, which is crucial for improving vaccine demand among the vulnerable group-pregnant and postpartum women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Influenza remains a major public health issue, leading to millions of severe cases and many deaths annually. Although educational and childcare institutions are key transmission points for the spread of the virus in communities, few studies have comprehensively examined the vaccination rates and their determinants in these settings.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide web-based survey to assess influenza knowledge, perceptions, and determinants of vaccine hesitancy based on the 5C model among childcare and educational professionals in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pediatric bronchiectasis action management plan to improve clinical outcomes: An RCT.

Chest

September 2025

Child and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Background: Managing bronchiectasis exacerbations is a priority for patients/parents/caregivers of children with bronchiectasis, yet evidence-based strategies among the pediatric population remain limited.

Research Question: Does the use of a personalized, written bronchiectasis action management plan (BAMP), compared to standard care, reduce non-scheduled doctor visits among children/adolescents with chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD)/bronchiectasis?

Study Design And Methods: Our multicenter, double-blind, superiority, randomized controlled trial enrolled children from three Australian respiratory departments between June 2018 and December 2020. Children/adolescents aged <19 years with CSLD/bronchiectasis were randomized to receive a personalized BAMP (intervention) or standard care (controls).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a vaccine-preventable disease. While many European countries conduct TBE surveillance, resulting incidence estimates do not distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. To understand TBE risk to unvaccinated individuals, we assessed incidence among unvaccinated populations in Europe.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Paternal factors affecting under-five immunization status in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vaccine

September 2025

School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom; ICAP, Columbia University, Lusaka, Zambia; Africa Centre for Inclusive Health Management, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; School of Health Systems & Public Health, University of Pretoria,

While maternal influences on childhood immunization have been extensively studied in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), paternal socioeconomic factors remain underexplored despite their potential impact on vaccination outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize current evidence on the influence of paternal characteristics on full childhood immunization status in SSA. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus for studies published between January 2014 and March 2025.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF