Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: This study evaluates the feasibility of a novel deep learning-accelerated half-fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence (HASTE-DL) compared to the conventional HASTE sequence (HASTE) in postoperative single-sequence MRI for the detection of fluid collections following abdominal surgery. As small fluid collections are difficult to visualize using other techniques, HASTE-DL may offer particular advantages in this clinical context.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 76 patients (mean age 65±11.69 years) who underwent abdominal MRI for suspected septic foci following abdominal surgery. Imaging was performed using 3-T MRI scanners, and both sequences were analyzed in terms of image quality, contrast, sharpness, and artifact presence. Quantitative assessments focused on fluid collection detectability, while qualitative assessments evaluated visualization of critical structures. Inter-reader agreement was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient, and statistical significance was determined with the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: HASTE-DL achieved a 46% reduction in scan time compared to HASTE, while significantly improving overall image quality (p<0.001), contrast (p<0.001), and sharpness (p<0.001). The inter-reader agreement for HASTE-DL was excellent (κ=0.960), with perfect agreement on overall image quality and fluid collection detection (κ=1.0). Fluid detectability and characterization scores were higher for HASTE-DL, and visualization of critical structures was significantly enhanced (p<0.001). No relevant artifacts were observed in either sequence.
Conclusion: HASTE-DL offers superior image quality, improved visualization of critical structures, such as drainages, vessels, bile and pancreatic ducts, and reduced acquisition time, making it an effective alternative to the standard HASTE sequence, and a promising complementary tool in the postoperative imaging workflow.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.039 | DOI Listing |