Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Approximately 50-70% of patients with advanced cancer will experience bone metastases. The link between metastatic lesions and pathological bones is especially troubling since more metastases mean a higher chance of painful fractures, which can reduce mobility and often require surgery. Therefore, fracture risk predictions are essential for managing patients with bone metastases. However, the current methods for evaluating the risk of fractures are subjective, with low predictive value. This paper highlights how there being no effective comprehensive models for grouping patients by fracture risk due to skeletal metastases makes it harder to create personalized treatment plans; presents the methods currently used for objective evaluations of the pathological fracture risk in bone metastases; and discusses their pros and cons.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192531 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060309 | DOI Listing |