Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The indications for liver transplantation continue to expand to meet the growing need of patients with end-stage liver disease and select hepatic malignancies. Living donor liver transplantation allows for access to transplant with recipient outcomes superior to deceased donor liver transplantation. To ensure absolute safety of the donor and optimal outcome of the recipient, potential liver donors are subjected to an exhaustive preoperative evaluation. Radiological studies play a pivotal role in assessing the donor liver anatomy to assess suitability for donation and to facilitate surgical planning. Many living donor centers supplement single-agent contrast-enhanced MRCP (gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium) with contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) for delineation of arterial anatomy. Excellent hepatic and portal venous mapping as well as biliary tract visualization has been seen, eliminating the need for CTA in studies. This review provides a case-based analysis of the proposed dual-contrast-enhanced MRCP protocol, emphasizing the advantages of a single diagnostic study over traditional multi-modality approaches while also discussing potential limitations and areas requiring further investigation. Evidence level: 4. Technical efficacy: Stage 1.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70010 | DOI Listing |