Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: When discussing body weight with health care professionals (HCPs), people living with obesity (PwO) can feel stigmatised by specific terms. In English-speaking research settings, PwO have expressed preferences for "technical" or health-related terms (e.g., weight; body mass index [BMI]), as opposed to vernacular terms (e.g., fatness), but no such studies have been conducted in a Danish linguistic and cultural setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate preferences of PwO for weight-related terminology in conversations with HCPs in a Danish context.

Methods: The study utilised survey data from the Awareness, Care, and Treatment In Obesity maNagement-Denmark (ACTION-DK) study among Danish adults with a self-reported BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2.

Results: A total of 879 Danish adults with obesity completed the questionnaire on preferred weight-related terminology, preferred HCP communication actions in weight loss conversation, and acceptability of HCPs raising the topic of weight. Respondents preferred technical or health related, person-first terminology; weight, overweight, high BMI, and higher weight were most preferred; fat, extra large, chubby, morbid obesity, and curvy were least preferred. A total of 71% respondents appreciated their HCP raising the topic of weight. When prioritising HCP communication actions in weight-loss conversations, PwO emphasised empathy and respectfulness over concrete actions.

Conclusion: The present study is the first to investigate PwO preference for weight-related terminology in a Danish setting, with findings overall in support of similar international studies. The identification of specific, acceptable terms, together with the proportion of respondents appreciating their HCP raising the topic of weight, indicate that respectful conversations between PwO and HCPs about weight are possible. However, HCPs should always enquire about an individual's preferences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331247PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000546218DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weight-related terminology
16
raising topic
12
topic weight
12
weight
9
people living
8
living obesity
8
action-dk study
8
study investigate
8
danish adults
8
hcp communication
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: When discussing body weight with health care professionals (HCPs), people living with obesity (PwO) can feel stigmatised by specific terms. In English-speaking research settings, PwO have expressed preferences for "technical" or health-related terms (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinicians and researchers may struggle with appropriate terminology when discussing body size. Pathologizing larger bodies has led to use of medicalized terms. Previous studies have focused on terminology preferences among participants not in larger bodies, leaving out those most affected by the terminology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Weight stigma is a common experience for adolescents at high weight statuses. Prior research regarding experiences of weight stigma in adolescence has been in primarily homogenous samples. The present study sought to characterize weight stigma experiences and internalization in adolescents from low-income backgrounds.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Commonly used terms like "obese person" have been identified as stigmatizing by those with lived experience. Thus, this study sought to revise a commonly used measure of weight stigmatizing attitudes, the Attitudes Toward Obese Persons (ATOP) scale.

Methods: The original terminology in the 20-item ATOP (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates how different groups—general public, family physicians, and obesity researchers—prefer to refer to individuals with large bodies, emphasizing terminology that can reinforce weight stigma.
  • - Data was collected on commonly used terms, phrases heard in professional settings, and those deemed socially acceptable by participants, revealing both similarities and differences in terminology preferences.
  • - The findings suggest a need for more inclusive language strategies in research and clinical practice that go beyond traditional person-first language to better humanize interactions with people who have larger bodies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF