A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comprehensive molecular profiling in MOTION study. | LitMetric

Comprehensive molecular profiling in MOTION study.

Cancer Genet

Department of Chemotherapy, Federal State Budgetary Institution (N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology) of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 115478, Russia; The Multidisciplinary Clinical Center Kommunarka, Moscow 108814, Russia.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Comprehensive molecular profiling (CMP) and molecularly matched therapy (MMT) have uncertain roles in advanced solid tumors. This study evaluates CMP's real-world application in Russia.

Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study analyzed CMP data from 448 patients with advanced non-hematologic malignancies (2018-2024). Genomic alterations (GA) were classified by ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT).

Results: ESCAT tiers included I (15.4 %), II (4.9 %), III (31.5 %), IV (19.6 %), and V/X (28.6 %). Therapy data were available for 374 patients. MMT was recommended for 56.9 % but implemented in only 23.2 % (MMT group, n = 87). MMT group showed better objective response rate (61.3 % vs. 37.1 %, p = 0.001), disease control rate (24.0 % vs. 9.2 %, p = 0.003), and progression-free survival ratio (PFS 2/1) ≥ 1.3 (45.0 % vs. 16.2 %, p < 0.01) compared to non-MMT group (n = 287). Median overall survival (OS) was borderline improved (12 vs. 8 months, HR 0.74, p = 0.06). Reasons for non-MMT management were low GA targetability (40 %), drug unavailability (30 %), clinical decline (23 %), and clinician preference (7 %). Patients with ≤3 prior therapies, ECOG performance status 0-1, and molecular tumor board discussion saw significant OS gains with MMT even for ESCAT III-V GA (5 vs. 18 months, HR 0.25, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: MMT following CMP offers clinical benefit for selected patients, even with ESCAT III-V GA, underscoring its potential in personalized oncology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.06.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comprehensive molecular
8
molecular profiling
8
mmt group
8
escat iii-v
8
mmt
6
profiling motion
4
motion study
4
study introduction
4
introduction comprehensive
4
profiling cmp
4

Similar Publications