Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.

Curr Opin Crit Care

Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie.

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose Of Review: Temporary circulatory support (TCS) devices play a crucial role in stabilizing patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. They provide essential hemodynamic support and serve as a bridge to recovery, decision-making, heart transplantation, or long-term mechanical circulatory support. However, despite their increasing use, recent trials challenge their impact on survival. This review summarizes recent findings and discusses challenges in optimizing patient selection and device use.

Recent Findings: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) remains the most used TCS device. However, evidence suggests it is ineffective as a standalone therapy. Its value may lie in combination strategies, such as pairing with VA-ECMO, to enhance ventricular unloading. Recent randomized trials on VA-ECMO, including ECLS-SHOCK, have been disappointing. They show no survival benefit in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Even well conducted trials face limitations, including heterogeneous patient populations and challenges in endpoint selection, making definitive conclusions difficult. The Impella device showed promising results in the DanGer Shock trial, with reduced mortality compared to standard care. However, concerns persist about patient selection and the unexpectedly high mortality rate in the control group. Meanwhile, the role of temporary right ventricular assist devices is increasingly recognized, particularly in facilitating hemodynamic stability during left ventricular assist device implantation.

Summary: TCS has revolutionized the management of cardiogenic shock, but significant challenges remain. Further research is needed to refine patient selection, improve device integration, and optimize outcomes. Emerging technologies, including biocompatible materials and artificial intelligence for device monitoring, hold promise for advancing the field. Future studies should also prioritize multicenter collaborations and real-world data to address current limitations in evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001282DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiogenic shock
16
circulatory support
12
patient selection
12
temporary circulatory
8
ventricular assist
8
device
6
shock
5
support
4
cardiogenic
4
support cardiogenic
4

Similar Publications

Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) remains a prevalent and challenging complication in patients with heart failure (HF), associated with poor prognosis despite optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Current American and European guidelines recommend GDMT as first-line therapy, with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) reserved for severe symptomatic SMR patients who remain refractory. However, both guidelines preceded the reporting of pivotal randomized controlled trials (RESHAPE-HF2, MATTERHORN, and EFFORT) and emerging evidence in new clinical scenarios.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Coronary artery pseudoaneurysms (CAP) are rare, especially without any history of coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass graft. The symptoms range from asymptomatic to cardiogenic shock. Because of its rarity and variable symptoms, patients with CAP should be treated with an individualized approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) with irreversible structural damage has high mortality despite conventional surgery. Heart transplantation (HTx) remains underused in active IE owing to guideline limitations and historical contraindications.

Case Summary: A 61-year-old man with recurrent prosthetic valve IE (aortic/tricuspid vegetations, perivalvular abscesses, and coronary embolism) developed cardiogenic shock.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fulminant myocarditis is a rare but life-threatening complication of influenza A infection that can result in acute biventricular failure leading to cardiogenic shock. Here, we present the case of a young patient who developed acute bilateral heart failure secondary to influenza A and was successfully stabilized using both right and left-sided Impella devices. This case highlights the critical role of early and aggressive mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in managing fulminant myocarditis and emphasizes the utility of Impella in cases of severe cardiac dysfunction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Age-related differences in Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS) have been described, but there is limited information regarding TTS patients who develop cardiogenic shock (CS).

Methods And Results: We analysed data from 408 CS-TTS patients in the RETAKO registry. Patients were stratified into three age groups: ≤50 years (9%), 51-74 years (48%), and ≥75 years (43%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF