A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The feasibility of a patient oriented interactive panoramic virtual tour for external beam radiation therapy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The integration of digital technology in healthcare, particularly for patient education and experience, is rapidly advancing. This pilot study examined the feasibility of an interactive panoramic virtual tour for improving patient experiences in an external beam radiation therapy (RT) setting at a smaller center.

Methods: A virtual tour of the RT department was developed using specialized software and 360-degree 8K camera. The study utilized a two-group design: a control group (33 patients) not exposed to the tour and an experimental group (35 patients) who accessed the tour via the MyHealth platform prior to RT treatment. The survey measured levels of anxiety, comfort with treatment course, knowledge about the facility, navigation through a course of RT, and satisfaction with overall treatment on a 1-10 scale, with 10 being a more desirable outcome.

Results: The experimental group reported improved outcomes compared to the control group across all parameters: anxiety levels were lower (mean: 7.3 ± SD: 2.6 vs. 6.5 ± 3.3; p = 0.32), though variances differed significantly (p = 0.03). Comfort levels were higher (9.1 ± 1.7 vs. 8.4 ± 2.1; p = 0.27), knowledge about the cancer center increased (8.7 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 2.4; p = 0.27) with unequal variances (p = 0.03), and ease of navigation slightly improved (9.8 ± 0.6 vs. 9.4 ± 1.9; p = 0.61). Satisfaction levels were similar in the experimental group (9.6 ± 1.1 vs. 9.5 ± 1.2; p = 0.74).

Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that an interactive virtual tour may enhance certain aspects of the RT patient experience, although the small sample size limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions. The integration of virtual tours into RT practices reflects a shift towards more interactive and patient-friendly approaches in healthcare by demystifying the RT process and providing accessible information. Future research with larger, more diverse cohorts at a larger institution is warranted to confirm whether these early findings generalize more broadly and to better quantify the impact of virtual tours on patient-reported outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162308PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1568405DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virtual tour
16
experimental group
12
interactive panoramic
8
panoramic virtual
8
external beam
8
beam radiation
8
radiation therapy
8
pilot study
8
control group
8
group patients
8

Similar Publications