Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy is crucial for individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) to reach target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, there are limited data on disparities in therapy use among FH patients in the US.
Methods: An epidemiologic analysis of a US healthcare claims database (2016-2020) covering 324 million individuals. Inclusion criteria for this study comprised of individuals with a diagnosis of FH, defined by an ICD-10 diagnosis code of E.78.01. The G-computation approach based on multiple logistic regression models was used to estimate the marginal effects of demographic and socioeconomic variables on prescriptions for high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i).
Results: In the FH cohort (n = 85,457), 45.9% were female, 79.4% identified as White, 12.2% as Black, and 8.4% as Hispanic. Males were more likely to be prescribed high-intensity statins than females: risk difference (RD) [95% CI] = 0.091 [0.086, 0.096]; odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 2.03 [1.95, 2.11]. White individuals were more likely to get ezetimibe, PCSK9i, or combination therapy compared to Black individuals (RDs: 0.006-0.041; ORs: 1.22-1.32). Higher income was associated with increased odds of receiving these treatments (RDs: 0.005-0.060 and ORs: 1.17-1.58 for incomes >$50,000). Higher education was linked to a higher likelihood of receiving these treatments (RDs: 0.004-0.038 and ORs: 1.06-1.49 for education levels of some college and higher).
Conclusion: These findings highlight significant disparities, with more intensive lipid-lowering therapies prescribed to White, higher-income, and better-educated individuals. This underscores the need for equitable cardiovascular risk reduction strategies for all FH patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.199 | DOI Listing |