A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Clinical impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: a prospective multicentre cohort study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may radiologically identify or confirm underlying pathophysiologies in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), however, there are scant prospective data evaluating the impact on routine clinical care.

Methods: In a multicentre international cohort study of MINOCA, clinical diagnosis, diagnostic certainty and intended clinical management were prospectively determined before and again after CMR. The primary outcome was a composite of change in clinical diagnosis and/or management. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, change in diagnostic certainty and number-needed-to-test for deprescription of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Predictors of the primary outcome were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: In 320 patients, CMR was associated with change in diagnosis and/or management in 63% (95% CI 57% to 68%, p<0.001) and significantly increased diagnostic certainty (8/10 post-CMR (5-9) vs 6/10 pre-CMR (4-7), p<0.0001). Relevant predictors of the primary outcome on multivariable analysis were early CMR (≤14 days), absence of atheroma on coronary angiography and significant pre-CMR diagnostic uncertainty (≤5/10); CMR changed diagnosis and/or management in 80% of individuals with all three predictors versus 40% in those with none. In individuals where treating physicians initially chose to prescribe DAPT despite no obstructive culprit lesion, number-needed-to-test by CMR for DAPT deprescription was 3.

Conclusions: CMR in MINOCA is associated with significant changes in clinical diagnosis, diagnostic certainty and management. The impact on deprescription of unnecessary DAPT could have important implications for patient safety and costs and warrants further evaluation. Early CMR should be considered to augment diagnosis and management in MINOCA.

Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN75233845.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325181DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary outcome
12
cardiac magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
myocardial infarction
8
infarction non-obstructive
8
non-obstructive coronary
8
coronary arteries
8
cohort study
8
clinical diagnosis
8
diagnostic certainty
8

Similar Publications