Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: This study provides an indirect treatment comparison of ribociclib combined with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and ovarian function suppression (ribociclib + NSAI + OFS) vs. a frequently used treatment option in German clinical routine (tamoxifen ± OFS) in premenopausal patients with HR-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (BC).

Material And Methods: Data on premenopausal women treated with ribociclib and tamoxifen were derived from the NATALEE clinical trial (NCT03701334) and the retrospective German data collection CLEAR-B, respectively. NATALEE trial eligibility criteria were applied to the CLEAR-B dataset. Standardized mortality ratio weights were used for propensity score (PS) adjustment to balance study populations. All hazard ratios (HR) were calculated based on a 4-year-observation period for both treatment arms. Effectiveness endpoints comprised invasive and distant disease-free survival (iDFS, dDFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety-related endpoints were treatment termination (TT) and toxicity-related TT (TTtox). For safety comparisons, the ribociclib arm was divided into groups that discontinued ribociclib + NSAI + OFS or ribociclib only.

Results: Significant beneficial effects favoring ribociclib + NSAI + OFS (n = 1115) over tamoxifen ± OFS (n = 822) were observed for all effectiveness outcomes (iDFS [HR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.35; 0.71); p < 0.01]; dDFS [HR = 0.52 (95% CI 0.35; 0.77); p = 0.01], RFS [HR = 0.42 (95% CI 0.29; 0.62); p < 0.01], OS [HR = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18; 0.63); p = 0.01]) during the 4-year-observation period. The effect of early treatment discontinuation showed no significant differences between ribociclib + NSAI + OFS and tamoxifen ± OFS (TT-a: HR = 1.2 [95% CI: 0.71; 2.01], p = 0.48; TTtox-a: HR = 0.54 [95% CI 0.22; 1.30], p = 0.23).

Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, ribociclib + NSAI + OFS demonstrated advantages across all effectiveness endpoints, including OS, in premenopausal women with HR+, HER2- early BC, without increasing overall treatment discontinuation rates compared to tamoxifen ± OFS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158542PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2561-6640DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ribociclib nsai
12
nsai ofs
12
indirect treatment
8
treatment comparison
8
ribociclib
8
comparison ribociclib
8
ribociclib combined
8
combined non-steroidal
8
non-steroidal aromatase
8
aromatase inhibitors
8

Similar Publications

Ribociclib + nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) and abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (ET) are approved for high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer based on data from the NATALEE and monarchE trials, respectively. No trials have directly compared efficacy and safety of adjuvant ribociclib and abemaciclib. This study compared relative efficacy and safety of adjuvant ribociclib + NSAI versus abemaciclib + ET using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: On September 17, 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for the adjuvant treatment of adults with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative stage II and III early breast cancer (EBC) who are at high risk of recurrence.

Patients And Methods: The FDA approval was based on NATALEE, a randomized (1:1), open-label, multicenter, multinational trial in adults of any sex or menopausal status with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative stage II and III EBC who received ribociclib plus an AI (Ribo + AI, n = 2,549) versus an AI (n = 2,552); patients also received goserelin as clinically indicated. Ribociclib was given at 400 mg once daily (3 weeks on/1 week off) for up to 36 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study provides an indirect treatment comparison of ribociclib combined with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and ovarian function suppression (ribociclib + NSAI + OFS) vs. a frequently used treatment option in German clinical routine (tamoxifen ± OFS) in premenopausal patients with HR-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (BC).

Material And Methods: Data on premenopausal women treated with ribociclib and tamoxifen were derived from the NATALEE clinical trial (NCT03701334) and the retrospective German data collection CLEAR-B, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The phase III NATALEE trial reported a statistically significant invasive disease-free survival benefit with ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) versus an NSAI alone in stage II/III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. In this study, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from NATALEE.

Patients And Methods: Patients were randomized to receive ribociclib plus NSAI or NSAI alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The NATALEE trial evaluated the effectiveness of ribociclib in combination with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) compared to NSAI alone over three years for treating HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients.
  • The study involved 5,101 patients who were randomized to receive either ribociclib plus NSAI or NSAI alone, with the primary focus on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS).
  • Results showed that ribociclib plus NSAI significantly improved iDFS, with 90.7% of patients remaining disease-free compared to 87.6% for those on NSAI alone, while safety profiles remained consistent with no new safety concerns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF