98%
921
2 minutes
20
BackgroundHigh quality surgical patient care requires coordination of multidisciplinary teams with hierarchical structures. Good team communication is essential for optimal patient safety. We examined preferred modes of communication with attending surgeons to develop methods for improved team communication.MethodsAn anonymous survey was emailed to members of a single institution's surgery department, perioperative services, and hospital administration and distributed via QR code at the weekly surgery department conference. Respondents ranked their preferred modes of communication with attending surgeons from the following options: email, Epic secure chat, in person, Microsoft Teams chat, pager (traditional, Spok, or Voalte), phone call, and other, and responses were compared by role and experience.ResultsOf 49 respondents, 19 (39%) were attending physicians; 13 (27%), residents or fellows; 6 (12%), nurses; 3 (6%), advanced practice providers; 1 (2%), surgery scheduler; and 7 (14%), other. In-person and phone communication ranked highest and pager, lowest within all groups. Difference-in-difference analyses showed no significant overall ranking differences by role ( = 0.10), including when comparing attendings to non-attendings ( = 0.15), or by departmental experience ( = 0.40). Non-attendings ranked in-person communication higher ( = 0.032) and email lower ( = 0.039) than did attendings. There were no other significant differences in communication preferences by subgroup.DiscussionOverall and by subgroup, verbal communication with attending surgeons is preferred over non-verbal communication. Efforts should be made to de-emphasize electronic communication. Patient outcomes from implementation of frameworks that enable verbal communication within and among surgical teams require further study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348251350997 | DOI Listing |
J CME
September 2025
AO Foundation, AO Education Institute, Davos Platz, Switzerland.
Integrating patient perspectives in medical education is increasingly recognised as critical for patient-centred care. However, many continuing professional development (CPD) programmes - particularly in surgical education - lack a structured approach to involve the patient perspective. This study explored faculty awareness, exposure, engagement and perceived barriers to integrating patient perspectives in surgeon education.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Plastic Surgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, Bogotá, Colombia.
Periorbital defects resulting from oncologic resections, trauma, or congenital malformations pose a complex reconstructive challenge, due to the need to simultaneously restore eyelid function and facial esthetics. We present the case of a male patient in his seventh decade of life with a right orbitomalar squamous cell carcinoma, who underwent a wide oncologic resection involving the upper and lower eyelids, as well as the malar and infraorbital regions. Reconstruction was performed using a radial free forearm flap from the left arm, including the palmaris longus tendon, which was strategically anchored to the medial canthus and orbital rim to provide dynamic eyelid support.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld Neurosurg
September 2025
Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA; Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA.
Introduction: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) is based on a less-invasive access corridor through the retroperitoneum and psoas muscle, though concerns persist over postoperative weakness and neuropathy on the surgical side. This study investigates if the trans-psoas LLIF approach is associated with long-term changes in psoas morphology, hip flexor (HF) weakness, and lower extremity dysesthesia.
Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed all LLIF cases at a single institution from January 2016 to June 2024.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
September 2025
Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UConn Health - University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington CT 06030.
Study Objective: To assess the impact of surgeon gender on the timing of surgical intervention for ovarian torsion.
Design: This is a multi-center retrospective study of patients 18-50 years old, diagnosed with ovarian torsion between January 2012 and July 2023, and who underwent surgical management.
Setting: Multi-center, retrospective observational study.
Surg Endosc
September 2025
The Griffin Institute, London, UK.
Background: Robotic surgery has witnessed rapid growth and development, with a concomitant training requirement. However, educational methods can vary, for example, industry or clinician led. This can result in heterogeneous training.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF