A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

LabQAR: A Manually Curated Dataset for Question Answering on Laboratory Test Reference Ranges and Interpretation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Laboratory tests are crucial for diagnosing and managing health conditions, providing essential reference ranges for result interpretation. The diversity of lab tests, influenced by variables like the specimen type (e.g., blood, urine), gender, age-specific, and other influencing factors such as pregnancy, makes automated interpretation challenging. Automated clinical decision support systems attempting to interpret these values must account for such nuances to avoid misdiagnoses or incorrect clinical decisions. In this regard, we present (oratory uestion nswering with eference Ranges), a manually curated dataset comprising 550 lab test reference ranges derived from authoritative medical sources, encompassing 363 unique lab tests and including multiple-choice questions with annotations on reference ranges, specimen types, and other factors impacting interpretation. We also assess the performance of several large language models (LLMs), including LLaMA 3.1, GatorTronGPT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4o, in predicting reference ranges and classifying results as normal, low, or high. The findings indicate that GPT-4o outperforms other models, showcasing the potential of LLMs in clinical decision support.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12155050PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.03.25328882DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reference ranges
20
manually curated
8
curated dataset
8
test reference
8
lab tests
8
clinical decision
8
decision support
8
ranges
6
reference
5
labqar manually
4

Similar Publications