98%
921
2 minutes
20
Importance: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the criterion standard for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Achieving target first medical contact (FMC)-to-device time is a quality metric in STEMI care.
Objectives: To describe site-level variability in achieving target FMC-to-device time (≤90 minutes for primary presentations to PCI-capable hospitals and ≤120 minutes for transfers), compare treatment times according to hospital performance, location, and primary PCI volume, and assess whether these aspects are associated with clinical outcomes.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study from the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry from 2020 to 2022. Patients were recruited from a multicenter quality-improvement registry across 503 US hospitals. Patients with STEMI or STEMI equivalent who underwent primary PCI were included in this analysis.
Exposures: FMC-to-device time.
Main Outcomes And Measures: Hospital performance was determined by the proportion of patients meeting target FMC-to-device time at each site. Treatment times and outcomes were compared by hospital performance, location, and primary PCI volume.
Results: A total of 73 826 patients were analyzed (median [IQR] age, 62 [54-71] years; 53 474 male [72.4%]). Of 60 109 patients who presented directly to PCI-capable hospitals (primary presentations), 35 783 (59.5%) achieved an FMC-to-device time of 90 minutes or less, whereas 6900 (50.3%) of 13 717 transfers had an FMC-to-device time of 120 minutes or less. There was substantial institutional variability in achieving target FMC-to-device time for both primary presentations (median [IQR], 60.8% [51.2%-68.8%]) and transfers (median [IQR], 50.0% [32.5%-66.9%]). High-performing centers met all target treatment times more frequently. Low-performing sites experienced prolonged emergency department stays, catheterization laboratory arrival-to-PCI times, and transfer delays, varying by mode of presentation. Compared with urban centers, presentation to rural hospitals did not affect the odds of meeting target FMC-to-device time for primary presentations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20; 95% CI, 0.96-1.50) or transfers (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.50-1.47). Failure to achieve target FMC-to-device time was associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk for primary presentations (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 2.02-2.42) and transfers (aOR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.90-3.12). Low hospital performance was associated with increased mortality risk compared with high performance in primary presentations (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34). Outcomes were similar between rural vs urban and low vs high primary PCI volume centers.
Conclusions And Relevance: In this large cross-sectional study of patients with STEMI, there was substantial hospital-level variability in achieving target treatment times. Patients in whom target FMC-to-device time was not met and those presenting to low-performing hospitals had worse outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159851 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.1411 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Cardiol
August 2025
Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Importance: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the criterion standard for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Achieving target first medical contact (FMC)-to-device time is a quality metric in STEMI care.
Objectives: To describe site-level variability in achieving target FMC-to-device time (≤90 minutes for primary presentations to PCI-capable hospitals and ≤120 minutes for transfers), compare treatment times according to hospital performance, location, and primary PCI volume, and assess whether these aspects are associated with clinical outcomes.
Am Heart J
November 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Me
Background: While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reperfusion within 90 minutes of first medical contact (FMC) is indicated for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), long transport times in rural areas can make this unlikely. We sought to quantify Southeast US residents at risk of treatment delay due to transport.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of Southeast US residents was conducted using American Community Survey data and geographic information systems (GIS) to estimate emergency medical services (EMS) transport times to primary PCI (PPCI) centers.
Shock
October 2024
Department of Emergency, Beijing Pinggu District Hospital, Beijing, China.
Objective: To investigate factors influencing the late prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by direct percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 349 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with direct percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were categorized based on catheter laboratory activation time (CLAT) (≤15 or >15 min), time of arrival (working hours or out-of-hours), and mode of arrival (emergency medical services transportation or self-presentation).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFmedRxiv
July 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Background: Emergent reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 minutes of first medical contact (FMC) is indicated in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, long transport times in rural areas in the Southeast US make meeting this goal difficult. The objective of this study was to determine the number of Southeast US residents with prolonged transport times to the nearest 24/7 primary PCI (PPCI) center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Cardiol
February 2024
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, California.
Previous studies have documented longer treatment times and worse outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment times and outcomes for patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within a regional system of care. This was a retrospective study using data from the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF