Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To assess the performance of machine learning (ML) models trained on large publicly available databases in predicting extranodal extension (ENE) within a smaller single-institution cohort.
Methods: Patient data were derived from two datasets. The first, the NCDB containing 5551 patients, was used to train and validate the ML algorithms. NCDB data was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. To ensure fair comparison of prediction performance, data were randomly divided. The second, the WVU cohort containing 62 patients, was used as an independent test set for validation and simulation of a real-world scenario. Six key ENE-related variables (predictors) were selected based on importance and data availability.
Results: The generalizability of the ML models was validated using real data from our institute with an average AUC ROC of 0.74. Of all the models, AdaBoost had reasonable performance: precision of 72%, NPV of 0.74%, specificity of 0.81, AUC ROC of 0.74. Similarly, the XGBOOST and ensemble models demonstrated the strongest combination of sensitivity and precision, critical for correctly predicting ENE, with AUC ROC ranging from 0.71 to 0.75. Most models demonstrated modest sensitivity in predicting ENE.
Conclusion: This study proved the feasibility of using ML algorithms to predict ENE by using oncologic variables from the NCDB as a training dataset. These trained models generalize well, such that they accurately predicted ENE on a real-world single institution dataset.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.32330 | DOI Listing |