A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Exposure-response relationship of fedratinib in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Fedratinib is a potent, oral, Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). This report describes exposure-response (E-R) analyses of fedratinib based on pooled data from phase 2/3 studies in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, with or without prior ruxolitinib exposure.

Methods: Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposures were derived from the population PK analysis. Efficacy endpoints included spleen volume reduction ≥35% (SVR35) and total symptom score reduction ≥50% (TSS response). Safety endpoints included grade ≥3 anaemia or thrombocytopenia, any-grade nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea. The E-R models were developed using logistic regression analyses.

Results: Fedratinib exposure was positively associated with SVR35 (odds ratio [OR], 38.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4-118; P < 0.001) and TSS response (OR, 20.8; 95% CI, 6.27-69.2; P < 0.001), after adjusting for covariates. Baseline spleen volume was inversely associated with SVR35 (P = 0.029). Prior ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with SVR35 (P = 0.090) or TSS response (P = 0.326). Although numerically higher incidence of adverse events was observed in patients with higher fedratinib exposure, there was no statistically significant association between fedratinib exposure and any safety related endpoints. Prior ruxolitinib exposure was associated with experiencing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (P = 0.004). Lower baseline haemoglobin level (<10 g/dL) and platelet count (<100 × 10/L) were associated with experiencing grade ≥3 anaemia (P < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001), respectively. Antiemetic prophylaxis was associated with lower rates of nausea/vomiting (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Fedratinib exposure was positively associated with spleen volume reduction and TSS responses, without having significant impact on safety. Fedratinib 400 mg once daily is an appropriate dose for patients with MF regardless of ruxolitinib exposure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70118DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients intermediate-2
8
intermediate-2 high-risk
8
endpoints included
8
exposure-response relationship
4
fedratinib
4
relationship fedratinib
4
fedratinib patients
4
high-risk myelofibrosis
4
myelofibrosis aims
4
aims fedratinib
4

Similar Publications