A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Validation of a 15-Gene Prognostic Signature in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: We previously developed and validated a 15-gene prognostic signature (15G score) in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Given its ability to differentiate aggressive and indolent disease, we sought to apply the 15G score to patients with metastatic ccRCC to evaluate its prognostic performance in this setting.

Methods: We analyzed 2,121 patients from four major metastatic ccRCC trial data sets: IMmotion 151 (), IMmotion 150 (), Javelin Renal 101 (), and Checkmate 009, 010, and 025 () and assessed six treatment groups: atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sunitinib, atezolizumab, avelumab plus axitinib, nivolumab, and everolimus. We classified patients into 15G score high or low using RNA-sequencing and a previously derived threshold. We tested the association of 15G score high with progression-free survival (PFS) in each treatment group using Cox proportional hazards with and without controlling for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk group. Overall survival (OS) was also tested where these data were available.

Results: A high 15G score was associated with significantly worse PFS in four of the six treatment groups: atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sunitinib, atezolizumab, and everolimus (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4 to 2.2], 1.7 [1.4-2.0] 2.8, [95% CI, 1.6 to 4.9], and 1.5 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.2], respectively; all < .05). Within and , where MSKCC risk stratification were available for multivariable analyses, high 15G score remained independently associated with worse PFS in atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sunitinib, and everolimus (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4 to 2.2], 1.6 [95% CI, 2.3], respectively; all < .05). A 15G high score was also associated with worse OS, which was significant in everolimus and near significant in nivolumab (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.2] and 1.4 [95% CI, 0.9 to 2.0]).

Conclusion: The 15G score was independently prognostic in metastatic ccRCC among patients receiving different systemic therapy regimens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148224PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00213DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

15g score
28
[95% 22]
16
metastatic ccrcc
12
atezolizumab bevacizumab
12
bevacizumab sunitinib
12
associated worse
12
15-gene prognostic
8
prognostic signature
8
clear cell
8
cell renal
8

Similar Publications