Severity: Warning
Message: opendir(/var/lib/php/sessions): Failed to open directory: Permission denied
Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php
Line Number: 365
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The diagnosis and management of pneumonia is often challenging due to its overlapping clinical presentations with other respiratory illnesses, low pathogen identification rates, and slow turnaround time of conventional bacterial cultures. These factors contribute to both inadequate empiric therapy and overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which can negatively impact outcomes. Recently, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) assays capable of rapidly detecting multiple bacterial respiratory pathogens and resistance genes have emerged. However, their clinical utility in pneumonia management remains uncertain.
Objective: To assess the utility of bacterial mPCR assays in pneumonia diagnosis, their impact on antimicrobial usage, and their effect on patient outcomes.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using MEDLINE to identify observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the accuracy and clinical impact of bacterial mPCR tests for pneumonia.
Results: Bacterial mPCR assays demonstrate high sensitivity for pathogen detection, rapid turnaround compared to conventional cultures, and the ability to identify many common resistance genes. They may also improve pathogen detection in patients who received empirical antibiotics prior to specimen collection. However, mPCRs do not detect all potential pathogens, cannot reliably differentiate colonisation from infection, and may show discordance between genetic and phenotypic resistance. mPCR panels also generally require lower respiratory tract specimens, limiting their utility since many pneumonia patients cannot produce adequate sputum. Observational studies and RCTs suggest that mPCR may help optimise antibiotic selection, but RCTs have not clearly demonstrated reductions in overall antibiotic use or improved clinical outcomes including mortality. Implementation of mPCR without structured antimicrobial stewardship may limit clinical impact.
Conclusions: Bacterial mPCR assays offer rapid and sensitive pathogen detection, but their integration into pneumonia management requires careful consideration of clinical context and expert antimicrobial stewardship guidance. Future research should focus on optimising their diagnostic and therapeutic applications, evaluating cost-effectiveness, and assessing patient-centered outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222297 | DOI Listing |