Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and evaluating postoperative micronutrient disturbances in patients with super-obesity.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical records of patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥50 kg/m² who underwent either OAGB or LSG.

Results: A total of 92 patients were included in the analysis (53 in the LSG group and 39 in the OAGB). The OAGB group was significantly older than the LSG group (median: 41 vs 33 years, respectively; P =.001). Baseline weight, height, BMI, electrolyte levels, and most biochemical markers were comparable between groups. The LSG group had a significantly shorter operative time than the OAGB group (median: 30 vs 53 min, respectively; P <.0001). Comorbidities were more prevalent in the OAGB group than in the LSG group, with higher rates of diabetes mellitus and hypertension (35.9% vs 3.8%, respectively; P <.0001) and ischemic heart disease (12.8% vs 0.0%, respectively; P =.012). Postoperative hospital stay and overall complication rates were similar (3.8% in the LSG group vs 7.8% in the OAGB group; P =.349). At 12 months, the OAGB group achieved significantly greater %excess body weight loss than the LSG group (86.6% vs 78.2%, respectively; P <.0001). Although early postoperative weight loss was comparable, the OAGB group had a lower median weight at 12 months than the LSG group (78.5 vs 89.0 kg, respectively; P =.003). Postoperative albumin, hemoglobin, ferritin, and zinc levels were significantly lower in the OAGB group than in the LSG group (P ≤.03).

Conclusion: OAGB achieved more significant long-term weight loss than LSG in patients with super-obesity. However, OAGB was associated with a higher risk of micronutrient deficiencies, particularly in iron, vitamin B12, and zinc, than LSG. LSG may be preferable for patients at higher risk of nutritional deficiencies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102112DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lsg group
12
one-anastomosis gastric
8
gastric bypass
8
sleeve gastrectomy
8
weight loss
8
oagb group
8
group median
8
oagb
5
group
5
comparative outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective obesity treatment. The increasing number of MBS among young patients has led to more post-bariatric pregnancies. Our study investigates how breastfeeding duration impacts postpartum weight retention and health outcomes for mothers and babies after MBS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication versus standard sleeve gastrectomy in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomised trial.

Diabetes Obes Metab

September 2025

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Bariatric Metabolic Surgery, Research Institute of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Ur

Aims: This randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy of modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) versus standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with obesity.

Materials And Methods: Eighty patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥27.5 kg/m with comorbidities or ≥32.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Efficacy and Safety of Classic vs. Hard Techniques in Long-Term Weight Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

J Metab Bariatr Surg

August 2025

Department of Bariatric Surgery, Tashkent Medical Academy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Classic and Hard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) techniques, with a focus on long-term weight loss outcomes and complication rates over a 3-year follow-up period.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 785 patients who underwent LSG between January 2019 and December 2022, with follow-up completed by 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to surgical technique: Classic LSG (n=372), involving standard resection along the lesser curvature using a 36-French bougie; and Hard LSG (n=413), characterized by more extensive fundal mobilization and creation of a narrower gastric tube using a 32-French bougie.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aims to develop recommendations on reporting baseline features and outcomes from axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical trials based on the recently updated instrument set of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) core outcome set (COS).

Methods: A steering group (SG) convened a workgroup (WG), consisting of 13 ASAS members including rheumatologists, methodologists, epidemiologists, and 2 Young ASAS members. Recommendations on reporting axSpA trials baseline features and outcomes were developed in 3 steps: (1) the SG identified relevant baseline features from key axSpA clinical trials and formulated a proposal on how outcomes related to the instruments in the ASAS COS should be presented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to explore the effects of prehabilitation strategies on the psychological state and glucose metabolism markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Methods: A total of 120 eligible patients undergoing elective LSG between January 2024 and December 2024 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the control group or the observation group, with 60 patients in each group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF