A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Fluorescent Cholangiography for Acute Cholecystitis: Is It Safe? | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: According to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG-18), delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) after recovering from acute cholecystitis (AC) is recommended for patients with poor status. Moreover, DLC for patients with good status remains controversial, and TG-18 does not include clinical questions regarding fluorescent cholangiography (FC). In this study, we evaluated the clinical value and safety of FC during DLC.

Methods: We performed DLC in 226 patients after recovering from AC. The electronic medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed, focusing on preoperative assessment and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Biliary and/or arterial injuries were treated as intraoperative complications.

Results: Of the study patients, 144 underwent DLC with FC. Among the remaining 82 patients who underwent DLC without FC, the rate of intraoperative complications was 7.3% (n = 6), which was significantly higher than in those who underwent DLC with FC (0%) (p = 0.002). The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy during DLC with FC (1.4%) was significantly lower than that during DLC without FC (15.9%). The mean operative time was not significantly different between the patients who underwent DLC with and without FC (p = 0.503). The mean blood loss and postoperative complications in patients who underwent DLC with FC were significantly lower than those who underwent DLC without FC (p = 0.041 and p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions: Utilizing FC can reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, the conversion rate, and blood loss during DLC; therefore, DLC with FC is recognized as a safe procedure for patients with AC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134524PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ases.70092DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

underwent dlc
24
dlc
13
patients underwent
12
patients
9
delayed laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic cholecystectomy
8
fluorescent cholangiography
8
acute cholecystitis
8
cholecystectomy dlc
8
intraoperative postoperative
8

Similar Publications