Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is a useful diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although wave height fluctuations have been observed in EPSIS waveforms, their clinical significance remains unclear. We hypothesized that the magnitude of these fluctuations may reflect lower esophageal sphincter functionality. This study aimed to evaluate the association between wave height fluctuations and objective acid reflux parameters.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with GERD symptoms who underwent both EPSIS and 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring at a single tertiary center between June 2020 and December 2023. Abnormal acid reflux was defined as an acid exposure time (AET) ≥6.0%. Wave height was defined as the difference in intragastric pressure between the crest and trough of the EPSIS waveform. A diagnostic cut-off value for wave height was determined, and factors associated with elevated wave height were analyzed.
Results: A total of 129 patients were included, of whom 29 (22.5%) had abnormal acid reflux. The median wave height was 2.5 mmHg. Patients with AET ≥6% had significantly higher wave heights than those with AET <6% (P = 0.0141). A wave height of 3.1 mmHg demonstrated optimal diagnostic performance for predicting abnormal AET. Multivariate analysis revealed that abnormal AET (odds ratio 3.43, 95% confidence interval 1.39-8.44, P = 0.0074) was independently associated with wave heights ≥3.1 mmHg.
Conclusions: Wave height fluctuations in EPSIS waveforms may reflect lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction and serve as a novel predictor of pathological acid reflux in patients with GERD.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.15049 | DOI Listing |