A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in oral lichen planus treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes, including the oral cavity. The prevalence of oral lichen planus (OLP) in the general population is estimated to be between 0.5% and 2%, with a higher incidence observed in women aged between 30 and 80 years. The etiology of OLP remains unclear, which presents a significant challenge in terms of diagnosis and treatment. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the treatment of OLP.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted via multiple databases in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Results: A total of seven randomized controlled trials were subjected to analysis. It has been demonstrated that both PRP and i-PRF have the capacity to significantly improve clinical outcomes, including pain and lesion severity. However, the majority of studies have not demonstrated statistically significant differences between PRP/i-PRF and corticosteroid treatments.

Conclusions: While PRP and i-PRF demonstrate potential in alleviating symptoms and promoting tissue healing, their effectiveness appears to be analogous to that of corticosteroids in the majority of RCTs. Further high-quality, standardized studies are required to substantiate their function as alternative or adjunctive therapies in the management of OLP.

Trial Registration: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 28 November 2024 (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024615291).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121129PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06189-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lichen planus
12
systematic review
12
platelet-rich plasma
8
plasma prp
8
prp injectable
8
injectable platelet-rich
8
platelet-rich fibrin
8
fibrin i-prf
8
oral lichen
8
treatment systematic
8

Similar Publications