Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of using Two isocenter targets in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) versus a single isocenter target solely at the root entry zone (REZ).
Material And Methods: A retrospective study was conducted.The study involved 171 patients with severe facial pain caused by TN. Pain intensity was measured using a pre/post-BNI scale. Group A (85 patients) received 90 Gy using a single isocenter at REZ with a 4mm collimator, while Group B (86 patients) received 90 Gy at two isocenters of the REZ and distal cisternal segment. Statistical analyses were done to assess differences between post-BNI scores and pain-free durations in the groups.
Results: Both groups had a mean patient age of 50 years. Group A had a longer presurgical pain duration (98 months) than Group B (78 months). In Group A, 33% reported pain relief to BNI class II and 67% to class III, while in Group B, 70% reported pain relief to BNI class I and 30% to BNI class II. Group A had a 40% 8-week pain relief rate, while Group B had a higher percentage of painfree durations of 6-7 weeks (21%) and 9 weeks (39%). Group B had a higher incidence of post-op facial numbness (27% vs. 14% in Group A). Significant differences existed between post-BNI pain intensities and pain-free durations in both groups.
Conclusion: Patients who received 90 Gy radiation at two isocenters had better outcomes than those with a single isocenter for GKRS. While Group B experienced earlier pain relief, Group A had fewer side effects. Two-isocenter GKRS is a safe and effective alternative for TN patients with a better pain management profile but an increased risk of facial hypoesthesia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2 | DOI Listing |