Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Exercise during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has potential to mitigate treatment-related declines in physical fitness, and to improve clinical outcomes, including toxicity and tumor response. However, optimal frequency and timing of exercise remains to be determined. Therefore, this pilot trial aimed to assess feasibility of 2 different exercise interventions during NCRT in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer and to evaluate potential clinical effects.
Methods: Patients were randomized into 1 of 3 study arms during NCRT: (a) 30-min aerobic exercise in-hospital within 1 h prior to each radiotherapy fraction (ExPR), (b) two 60-min supervised combined aerobic and resistance exercise sessions per week (AE+RE), and (c) usual care (UC). Feasibility was assessed by examining participation rate and exercise adherence. Intervention effects on physical fitness, health-related quality of life, treatment-related toxicity, and tumor response in patients with esophageal cancer were explored using regression analyses and 85% confidence intervals (85% CI).
Results: Thirty-seven patients with esophageal cancer (participation rate: 45%) and 2 patients with rectal cancer (participation rate: 14%) were included. Median session attendance was 98% (interquartile range (IQR): 96-100) in the ExPR and 78% (IQR: 33-100) in the AE+RE group. We found clinically relevant benefits of exercise on maximal oxygen uptake (VO)(ExPR: β = 9.7 mL/kg/min, 85% CI: 6.9-12.6; AE+RE: β = 5.6 mL/kg/min, 85% CI: 2.6-8.5) and treatment-related toxicity (ExPR: β = -2.8, 85% CI: -5.4 to -0.2; AE+RE: β = -2.6, 85% CI: -5.3 to 0.0). Additionally, good tumor response was found in 70% in AE+RE and ExPR vs. 55% in UC (OR = 1.9, 85% CI: 0.5-7.7).
Conclusion: Starting prehabilitation during NCRT is feasible, can increase starting fitness of traditional pre-surgical programs, and has potential to improve clinical outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101060 | DOI Listing |