A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Improving annotation efficiency for fully labeling a breast mass segmentation dataset. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death for women. Screening programs are deployed to detect cancer at early stages. One current barrier identified by breast imaging researchers is a shortage of labeled image datasets. Addressing this problem is crucial to improve early detection models. We present an active learning (AL) framework for segmenting breast masses from 2D digital mammography, and we publish labeled data. Our method aims to reduce the input needed from expert annotators to reach a fully labeled dataset.

Approach: We create a dataset of 1136 mammographic masses with pixel-wise binary segmentation labels, with the test subset labeled independently by two different teams. With this dataset, we simulate a human annotator within an AL framework to develop and compare AI-assisted labeling methods, using a discriminator model and a simulated oracle to collect acceptable segmentation labels. A UNet model is retrained on these labels, generating new segmentations. We evaluate various oracle heuristics using the percentage of segmentations that the oracle relabels and measure the quality of the proposed labels by evaluating the intersection over union over a validation dataset.

Results: Our method reduces expert annotator input by 44%. We present a dataset of 1136 binary segmentation labels approved by board-certified radiologists and make the 143-image validation set public for comparison with other researchers' methods.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that AL can significantly improve the efficiency and time-effectiveness of creating labeled mammogram datasets. Our framework facilitates the development of high-quality datasets while minimizing manual effort in the domain of digital mammography.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094908PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.3.035501DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

segmentation labels
12
digital mammography
8
dataset 1136
8
binary segmentation
8
labeled
5
labels
5
improving annotation
4
annotation efficiency
4
efficiency fully
4
fully labeling
4

Similar Publications