A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Pipeline shield reduces diffusion-weighted imaging-detected ischemia after intracranial aneurysm treatment compared with pipeline flex: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield technology (PED Shield, Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA) is a flow diverter designed to reduce thrombogenicity through phosphorylcholine surface modification. Although in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the thrombogenicity reducing effects of this technology, its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice remains unclear. This study aims to compare the number of post-procedure diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-positive lesions between PED Flex(Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA) and PED Shield to assess the impact of surface modification.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with PED Flex or PED Shield between April 2016 and March 2024 at a single institution. Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounders, and the number of post-procedure DWI-positive lesions was evaluated as the primary outcome.

Results: In total, 148 procedures (132 patients, 138 aneurysms) were included, with 68 (46%) treated with PED Flex and 80 (54%) with PED Shield. Propensity score matching resulted in 47 matched pairs. After matching, the median number of post-procedure DWI-positive lesions was nine (interquartile range (IQR): 3-17) in the PED Flex group and three (IQR: 1-6) in the PED Shield group, with a significantly lower number in the PED Shield group (regression coefficient β = -10.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): -16.23 to -5.16), P<0.001).

Conclusion: After adjusting for confounders, the PED Shield group had significantly fewer post-procedure DWI-positive lesions than the PED Flex group, suggesting that phosphorylcholine surface modification technology may reduce thrombogenicity in real-world clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023229DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ped shield
24
number post-procedure
12
dwi-positive lesions
12
ped flex
12
ped
10
pipeline flex
8
retrospective cohort
8
cohort study
8
irvine usa
8
treated ped
8

Similar Publications