A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Impact of CHADS-VASc Score in the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing a Simplified Pathway for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is usually performed after a pre-procedural evaluation by transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) or cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Nevertheless, these ad-hoc examinations imply an additional use of hospital resources and time spending.

Aims: To investigate long-term clinical outcomes, effectiveness and safety of performing LAAC procedures without pre-procedural imaging assessment in patients with high and very high thromboembolic risk based on CHADS-VASc score.

Methods: From January 2016 to January 2023, 227 consecutive patients undergoing LAAC following an optimized pathway that removed the use of pre-procedural TOE or CCTA imaging assessment, were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on thromboembolic risk: 94 had CHADS-VASc scores ≥ 5 and 133 had CHADS-VASc scores < 5). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, or bleeding events at 2 years. Co-primary endpoints were device success, device-related thrombosis (DRT) and peri-device leaks (PDL) ≥ 3 mm at TOE follow-up.

Results: At 2 years, no significant differences were observed between groups in the primary composite endpoint (KM est. 24.81% vs. 20.21%, p = 0.7; aHR 0.85, CI: 0.48-1.50, p = 0.58). Device success was 98.7% overall, with no significant differences between groups (aOR 0.32% CI: 0.03-3.80; p = 0.37). DRT and PDL ≥ 3 mm rates were low (4.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.26% and 3.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.75, respectively). In-hospital complications were low and comparable in both groups.

Conclusions: In a consecutive series of patients undergoing LAAC, a simplified approach without pre-operative imaging assessment showed comparable results at 2-year for the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, or bleeding events in patients with CHADS-VASc score ≥ 5 and those with CHADS-VASc score < 5.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31613DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients undergoing
8
percutaneous left
8
left atrial
8
atrial appendage
8
appendage closure
8
imaging assessment
8
thromboembolic risk
8
impact chads-vasc
4
chads-vasc score
4
score outcomes
4

Similar Publications