98%
921
2 minutes
20
The assessment of voice quality plays a critical role in the clinical evaluation of hoarseness. However, no study has established a highly accurate method for the auditory-perceptual judgment of vocal roughness, which is one of the major components of hoarseness. In this study, we developed a multivariate acoustic model for quantifying vocal roughness using a tailored fundamental frequency (f) estimation algorithm. The newly devised parameters enabled the classification and quantification of subharmonics, a key component of rough voice. Furthermore, we introduce the acoustic roughness index (ARI), a predictive acoustic model that integrates these parameters with existing acoustic parameters. The ARI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and a strong correlation with auditory-perceptual roughness, establishing it as a robust index for the evaluation of vocal roughness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092608 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01702-2 | DOI Listing |
J Voice
September 2025
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Background: Strained voice quality-commonly referred to as vocal strain-is a hallmark of functional voice disorders such as muscle tension dysphonia and is often associated with vocal fatigue and laryngeal hyperfunction. Although listeners describe it as excessive vocal effort, strained voice quality frequently overlaps perceptually with breathiness and roughness, complicating reliable assessment. Despite its clinical relevance, no standardized acoustic definition of strained voice quality has been established.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenes (Basel)
July 2025
Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
: Perceptual analysis has highlighted that the voice characteristics of patients with rare congenital genetic syndromes differ from those of normophonic subjects. In this paper, we describe the voice phenotype, also called the phonotype, of patients with Crisponi/cold-induced sweating syndrome type 1 (CS/CISS1). : We conducted an observational study at the Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Rome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Voice
August 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Electronic address:
Unlabelled: This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of telepractice for delivering voice therapy to patients with vocal fold nodules (VFNs), comparing the results of voice assessments before and after voice therapy.
Study Design: Multicenter experimental research.
Methods: The study included 12 participants diagnosed with VFNs.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
August 2025
Service d'ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Importance: There is no consensus in the field for the management of postthyroidectomy unilateral vocal fold paralysis (VFP). In cases where recurrent laryngeal nerve transection is not present, a local inflammatory process is thought to cause VFP. The findings suggest that corticosteroids may have a beneficial effect in managing this phenomenon.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Voice
July 2025
Communication Technologies Research Center, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL; School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
Objective: While many research studies evaluate a single voice quality dimension to improve measurement precision, this approach often fails to capture the covariance among more than one voice quality. The goal of the current study was to investigate the relative utility of objective acoustic and bioinspired psychoacoustic-based measurement methods in a set of dysphonic voices that covary in severity from mild to severe along three voice quality dimensions.
Methods: Stimuli included 26 voices that varied across three levels of dysphonic severity (mild, moderate, and severe) in three covarying voice quality dimensions (breathy, rough, and strain) based on the dimension-specific severity rankings of all 26 stimuli by four voice experts.