Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Tattoo inks contain several substances, including organic and inorganic pigments, additives, and solvents, which may pose a health risk to not only the tattooed skin but also to other parts of the human body due to intradermal exposure. Substances in tattoo inks are regulated by entry 75 in Annex XVII of REACH Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006. However, despite these legal requirements, a well-defined criterion for the safety assessment of tattoo inks remains lacking. In this context, 2021 BfR opinion titled "Tattoo inks: minimum requirements and test methods" proposed a comprehensive risk assessment of pigments using in vitro/in-chemico data in accordance with OECD Guidelines and CLP Regulations. In the absence of experimental data, new approach methodologies (NAMs) may be used for data-gap filling. Therefore, this work evaluates the applicability of in silico NAMs for data-gap filling for a list of tattoo ink ingredients identified by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and BfR for genotoxicity assessment. Experimental in vitro genotoxicity data were acquired from the International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) which makes non-confidential REACH Study Results publicly accessible. The specific aims of this analysis were the evaluation of in silico genotoxicity predictions from publicly available QSAR tools and structural alerts, the development and validation of new QSAR models specific to tattoo ink ingredients, and the application of in silico models for categorization and prioritization of data-poor ingredients for further screening. Based on the workflow developed in this study, 4 high priority, 18 medium priority, and 2 low priority substances were identified for further assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087733PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.70010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tattoo ink
12
ink ingredients
12
tattoo inks
12
applicability silico
8
risk assessment
8
assessment tattoo
8
nams data-gap
8
data-gap filling
8
tattoo
6
assessment
5

Similar Publications

Red tattoo allergies after REACH regulation: a continuing problem.

Dermatol Reports

September 2025

"Tattoo poli" Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden.

Despite new EU regulations, allergies to red ink tattoos remain an urgent public health problem. Red tattoo pigments continue to occur at a clinically relevant rate. This observation raises critical questions about the effectiveness, scope, and enforcement of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Is Tattooing an Injection? Evaluating the Mechanics of Ink Placement.

Acta Biomater

August 2025

Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA. Electronic address:

Guidance recently released by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding tattoo inks describes tattooing as an injection process, but is injection the correct terminology to use when describing tattooing? This perspective aims to provide a brief overview of the core mechanics and science behind injection and tattoo processes, as well as emphasize the importance of using the correct terminology when referencing tattoos and the act of tattooing moving forward. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Due to a change in the FDA regulatory framework around cosmetics in December 2022, for the first time the FDA is in the process of actively regulating tattoo inks. Central to how tattoos will be regulated is whether tattoos and tattooing should be considered an injectable process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Near-Infrared Dye-Loaded Thermosensitive Hydrogels as Novel Fluorescence Tissue Markers.

Gels

August 2025

Division of Technology Convergence, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea.

Accurate intraoperative localization of deep-seated lesions remains a major challenge in minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. Current marking strategies-including ink tattooing and metallic clips-are limited by dye diffusion, or poor intraoperative visibility. To address these issues, we developed and evaluated four thermosensitive injectable hydrogel systems incorporating indocyanine green-human serum albumin (ICG-HSA) complexes: (1) hexanoyl glycol chitosan (HGC), (2) Pluronic F-127, (3) PCL-PEG-PCL, and (4) PLA-PEG-PLA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nontuberculous Mycobacterium Skin Infections Associated With One Tattoo Studio-Oregon, January-April 2023.

Clin Infect Dis

August 2025

Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division, Immunizations Program, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Surgical, cosmetic, and tattooing procedures can lead to nontuberculous mycobacterium skin and soft tissue infections. Eight Oregonians developed Mycobacterium immunogenum infections after receiving tattoos from the same artist. Tattoo ink was likely contaminated by self-prepared diluent.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beyond the ink: cellular and molecular effects of iron-based pigments on macrophages.

NanoImpact

August 2025

Chemistry and Biology of Metals, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS UMR5249, CEA, IRIG-LCBM, F-38054 Grenoble, France. Electronic address:

As ochre, iron oxide is among the most ancient pigments used by mankind for different purposes, including tattooing as demonstrated on tattoed mummies. Iron oxides are still used in tattooing nowadays and especially in dermopigmentation, an area of medical tattoing aiming at restoring the color of skin. This ancient use of iron oxide does not mean that it has no effect on cells, and especially on macrophages, the cells that maintain pigments particles on site in tattoos.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF