Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: The positive predictive value of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG] ≥2) varies widely between radiologists. The restriction spectrum imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a biophysics-based metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. We aimed to evaluate performance of RSIrs for patient-level detection of csPCa in a large and heterogenous dataset, and to combine RSIrs with clinical and imaging parameters for csPCa detection.
Materials And Methods: At 7 centers, participants underwent prostate MRI between January 2016 and March 2024. We calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate and compared patient-level csPCa detection to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and PI-RADS using AUC. We also evaluated csPCa discrimination by GG and combining RSIrs with clinical risk factors through multivariable regression.
Results: Among patients who met the inclusion criteria (n = 1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. Among biopsy-naïve patients (n = 877), AUCs for GG ≥ 2 vs non-csPCa were RSIrs = 0.73 (0.69-0.76), ADC = 0.54 (0.50-0.57), and PI-RADS = 0.75 (0.71-0.78). RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC ( < .01) and was comparable with PI-RADS ( = .31). RSIrs and PI-RADS combined outperformed either alone. The model with RSIrs, PI-RADS, age, and PSA density achieved the best discrimination of csPCa.
Conclusions: RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably with expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334330 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004611 | DOI Listing |