A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Correlation between donor-derived cell-free DNA and tissue gene expression in heart transplant patients undergoing for-cause endomyocardial biopsies. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The introduction of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) is changing how we diagnose rejection following heart transplantation (HT). This study aims to assess the accuracy of dd-cfDNA in detecting rejection as identified by MMDx and histology, with a focus on determining an optimal dd-cfDNA threshold to improve diagnostic performance.

Methods: Single-center prospective study of HT recipients undergoing for-cause biopsies with paired MMDx results and dd-cfDNA levels. We employed a receiver operator curve to evaluate the performance of dd-cfDNA levels to detect rejection assessed by both histology and MMDx. We also assessed the correlation between dd-cfDNA levels and MMDx rejection scores. A mixed-effects model was applied to account for repeated samples when appropriate.

Results: 247 for-cause biopsies were identified with a median of 21 months from HT and a median of 11 days between dd-cfDNA and biopsy. 56.7% of the samples had dd-cfDNA levels ≥0.20%. MMDx identified rejection in 27.1% of biopsies, compared to 7.7% identified by histology. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels were associated with a 4-fold increase in rejection rates by MMDx, mainly driven by a 5-fold increase in antibody-mediated rejection detection when compared to histology. Dd-cfDNA demonstrated superior performance in predicting rejection by MMDx (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.77; optimal cutoff dd-cfDNA value 0.30%). When incorporating a mixed-effects model, the predictive performance improved further (AUC of 0.89; optimal cutoff value 0.26%). In contrast, prediction based on histology resulted in a lower AUC of 0.64.

Conclusions: In a for-cause biopsy population, elevated dd-cfDNA levels were more predictive of rejection on MMDx than on histology, suggesting that molecular techniques may detect rejection at earlier stages than traditional histological methods. A dd-cfDNA cutoff of 0.26% provided the highest predictive accuracy for rejection by MMDx when applied within a mixed-effects model for repeated measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.04.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dd-cfdna levels
24
dd-cfdna
13
mixed-effects model
12
rejection mmdx
12
rejection
11
mmdx
10
donor-derived cell-free
8
cell-free dna
8
undergoing for-cause
8
mmdx histology
8

Similar Publications