A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Influence of soil spatial variability on the reliability of sandy slopes incorporating anisotropy and non-stationarity. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Influence of soil spatial variability on the reliability of cohesive soil slopes has been investigated extensively in the previous studies. However, it is seldom investigated for sandy slopes, especially incorporating anisotropy and non-stationarity. This paper explores the impact of the anisotropic spatial variation and non-stationary characteristics of soils on the reliability of sandy slopes. Specifically, two types of non-stationary random field (RF) are included, namely RF Type 1(soil strength increases along the depth) and RF Type 2 (strength increases along the direction perpendicular to bedding). For sandy slopes, the reliability index (β) is stable as the major autocorrelation distance of soil properties increases, and it decreases as the minor autocorrelation distance increases, which aligns with the observations for clay slopes. For slopes with horizontal bedding, the results of β under stationary RF are close to those under RF type 1. For dip-slopes and reverse-dip slopes with a 1:1 ratio, the difference between β under stationary RF and RF Type 1 is small. For dip-slopes with 1:2 ratio, this difference remains small, but for the reverse-dip slopes, it is significant. These findings differ from the previous studies on clay slopes, where the difference between β under stationary RF and RF Type 1 is significant for each slope scenario. Besides, β under RF type 2 is the smallest for dip slopes and reverse-dip slopes with ratio = 1:2, and it is the highest for reverse-dip slopes with ratio = 1:1.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080798PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323471PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sandy slopes
16
reverse-dip slopes
16
slopes
13
influence soil
8
soil spatial
8
spatial variability
8
variability reliability
8
reliability sandy
8
slopes incorporating
8
incorporating anisotropy
8

Similar Publications