Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Internalized weight stigma (IWS) refers to the internalization of societal weight-based prejudices. While research on external weight stigma is well-established, the psychological mechanisms underlying IWS remain underexplored. This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of IWS by examining the lived experiences of individuals with obesity and identifying key psychological processes contributing to IWS.
Design: A qualitative design was employed, using both in-depth interviews and photo-elicitation to explore the lived experiences of nine participants.
Methods: Participants were invited to take pictures of situations which made them feel stigmatized about their body size during a 2-week-long photography task. Subsequently, participants reflected on the implications of their photographs during a 60-minute research interview. IPA was used to guide the analysis of the interview data.
Results: Four key psychological processes contributing to IWS were identified: (1) Self-application of negative stereotypes, where participants internalized societal stigma, sometimes resisting it but still experiencing self-critical thoughts; (2) Imposition of an undesired identity, where societal labels restricted self-expression, leading participants to adopt socially acceptable personas; (3) Heightened anxiety and social vigilance, where participants experienced anxiety, hyper-awareness, and discomfort in public settings; and (4) Distress and coping, where emotional distress and coping strategies like social withdrawal appeared to reinforce IWS.
Conclusions: These findings extended existing literature by providing a data-driven conceptualization of IWS. The findings underscore the importance of developing psychological interventions that address both IWS and external societal weight stigma, focusing on strategies that challenge self-critical narratives and promote more adaptive self-concepts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078877 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12804 | DOI Listing |