A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Comparison of Two Different Scales in Identifying the Risk of Falls in Leukaemia and Lymphoma Patients. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to assess the risk of falls in leukaemia and lymphoma patients using the Itaki Fall Risk Scale and the Fall Risk Assessment Scale Developed by the Delmarva Foundation and compare the data collected.

Design: This study is descriptive and cross-sectional.

Methods: The sample consisted of 84 patients diagnosed with leukaemia and lymphoma who were hospitalised in the haematology ward between March 2021 and December 2021.

Data: Questionnaire, Itaki Fall Risk Scale, Delmarva Foundation Developed Fall Risk Assessment Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. Appropriate analyses were performed.

Results: According to both scales, the risk of falls increased as age, fatigue and pain scores increased.

Conclusions: This study found that the sensitivity of the Itaki Fall Risk Scale (79.6%) was higher than that of the Fall Risk Assessment Scale Developed by the Delmarva Foundation (63.3%) when there was fear of unassisted falling; the risk of falling also increased with increasing age, fatigue and pain scores according to both scales, and there was no difference between the two scales in terms of risk of falling.

Public Contribution: There is no public contribution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fall risk
24
risk falls
12
leukaemia lymphoma
12
itaki fall
12
risk scale
12
risk assessment
12
assessment scale
12
delmarva foundation
12
risk
11
falls leukaemia
8

Similar Publications