A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

In vitro embryolethality testing during the peri-implantation stage using 3D mouse embryoids: Comparison with 2D mouse cell cultures and the zebrafish embryo model. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The recent development of in vitro embryoid models may be a way to reduce or even replace animals in developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies. Here, we evaluated an in vitro mouse 3D embryoid model using three stem cell lineages including mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC), trophoblast stem cells (TSC) and extra-embryonic endoderm stem cells (XENC) to detect embryolethality of seven known positive or negative compounds at the peri-implantation stage in vivo. We performed a comparative study by testing these substances in parallel on monocultures of the individual cell lines in 2D and in zebrafish embryos. Embryoids were exposed to each compound for 48 h and analysed on day in vitro (DIV) 4, which resemble the peri-implantation embryo at E5.5 in vivo. Metabolic activity, morphological development and gene expression were evaluated. We showed that all early direct embryolethal compounds significantly reduced the metabolic activity of the embryoids at an in vivo relevant concentration range. Furthermore, this model could also detect embryolethal compounds that have specific adverse effects on extraembryonic structures. The additional endpoints (gene expression or morphological assessments) were required to detect adverse effects when only a minoritarian cell type of the embryoid was affected. In contrast, zebrafish embryos had a very low sensitivity, and the monocultures of the individual cell lines were less specific than the 3D embryoids. Combining 2D and 3D testing with carefully selected additional endpoints could serve as a powerful tool to assess the potential effects of new chemicals on embryo development at the peri-implantation stage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.108941DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peri-implantation stage
12
stem cells
12
monocultures individual
8
individual cell
8
cell lines
8
zebrafish embryos
8
metabolic activity
8
gene expression
8
embryolethal compounds
8
adverse effects
8

Similar Publications