A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Random RFPA Method for Modelling Rock Failure. | LitMetric

The Random RFPA Method for Modelling Rock Failure.

Rock Mech Rock Eng

Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610000 China.

Published: January 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The random rock failure process analysis (RRFPA) method was developed in this research to characterize the material spatial variability and uncertainty in rock failure modelling. The random field theory (RFT) was integrated with the traditional rock failure process analysis (RFPA) to model rock heterogeneity. In this approach, the variation of rock properties is represented as a function of relative distance, such that the influence of material intrinsic correlation on its fracturing behaviour can be appropriately captured. To validate the theory, 300 RRFPA simulations were conducted to investigate the failure characteristics of rock samples under compressive loading. The results showed that by incorporating a spectrum of material properties, the numerical outcomes exhibited distinct upper and lower bounds of stress across all testing scenarios, closely aligning with the experimental relationships. The histograms for uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus showed that both properties followed normal distributions, with the average values of 10.099 MPa and 1.818 GPa, respectively. The corresponding coefficients of variation were 0.450 and 0.038. The localized failure tended to result in a more rapid release of acoustic emission energy, but generated smaller cumulative energy compared to the overall failure pattern. In general, the maximum relative error of the RRFPA model was only 0.66% for uniaxial compressive strength, elastic modulus, and critical axial strain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048433PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04400-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rock failure
16
failure process
8
process analysis
8
uniaxial compressive
8
compressive strength
8
strength elastic
8
elastic modulus
8
rock
7
failure
7
random rfpa
4

Similar Publications