Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Rigorous evaluations of community water supply interventions are necessary to understand their impact on water quality and access. Our study in Beira, Mozambique assessed the impact of water infrastructure improvements in neighborhoods with or without piped water network upgrades. Data were collected from 642 households on microbial contamination in stored and source water, water access, and satisfaction with water service. The intervention reduced source water contamination by 33% and stored water by 14%. Regardless of intervention status, having a direct connection to the piped water network (versus none) was associated with 24% lower in source water but no difference in stored water. Intervention households and households with a direct connection had better water access and higher satisfaction. These findings suggest that urban water supply interventions can improve access to a safe water supply, but improvements may be compromised by water storage practices due to water intermittency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048000 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6313590/v1 | DOI Listing |