Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Literature exploring the medical profession through a generational lens is sparse. Every generation has unique priorities, values, and career expectations influencing their choices and behavior. The motives behind underlying differences and their impact on the career paths of medical graduates are not fully clear. This study explored generational differences in the career paths of medical graduates from the top academic medical school in Lebanon.

Methods: A web-based survey, which included 38 questions, was sent to all 3866 physician alums of Lebanon's top academic medical school. The survey was designed to assess generational differences in career paths with respect to the following outcomes: contract type, specialty type, practice settings and work-life time allocation. Data was collected between November 2018 and January 2019, with up to three invite reminders.

Results: There were 403 respondents to the survey, with a response rate of 10.4%. Overall, 369 were included in the final analysis, 114 (36.7%) Boomers [born 1946-1964], 137 (34.0%) Generation Xers [Born 1965-1980] and 118 (29.3%) Millennials [Born 1981-1996]. Findings show that the percentage of women increased with each generation (Boomers: 17.5%; Generation Xers: 39.4%; Millennials: 45.8%, p < 0.001). Across generations, marriage (Boomers: 87.7%; Generation Xers: 83.9%; Millennials: 35.6%, p < 0.001) and having kids (Boomers: 90.4%; Generation Xers: 81.0%; Millennials: 20.3%; p < 0.001) dropped whereas full-time contracts (Boomers: 81.5%; Generation Xers: 86.0%; Millennials: 93.9%, p = 0.019) and spouse employment increased (Boomers: 48.0%; Generation Xers: 68.7%; Millennials: 72.3%, p = 0.002). The odds of being full-time in Generation Xers (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [0.50; 2.72], p = 0.73) and Millennials (OR = 2.22, 95% CI [0.60; 8.20], p = 0.23) were not significantly higher than Boomers. Younger generations opted less for surgical specialties compared to Boomers, be it Generation Xers (OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.21; 0.92], p = 0.029) or Millennials (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.17; 1.90], p = 0.35). Generation Xers and Millennials were likelier to work in academic medical centers than Boomers. Compared to working in academic medical centers, the odds of working in private practice (Generation Xers: OR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.40; 1.42], p = 0.375; Millennials: OR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.12; 0.98], p = 0.046) or other settings (Generation Xers: OR = 0.49, p = 0.149, 95% CI [0.18, 1.29]; Millennials: OR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.11; 1.19], p = 0.285) were lower. Physicians across generations spent similar hours on professional work. Among work-related activities, time spent on research activities increased across generations (Boomers: 6.38 h/week; Generation Xers: 6.76 h/week; Millennials: 13.39 h/week, p = 0.001). Being a Generation Xer significantly increased the personal time spent on total domestic work by (0.190 h/week, p = 0.012) compared to being a Boomer; being a Millennial did not. Time allocated by physicians' spouses for household work decreased across generations (Boomers: 14.95 h/week; Generation Xers: 12.82 h/week; Millennials: 10.44 h/week, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: These findings provide empirical evidence documenting changes in career paths and work-life balance across generations in the medical field while also highlighting interesting trends. Further research is needed for additional insight into these generational differences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049804PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07179-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

career paths
16
generational differences
12
differences career
12
medical school
12
paths medical
8
medical graduates
8
top academic
8
academic medical
8
generation xers
8
medical
6

Similar Publications

Open-source software is the lifeblood of many modern research projects, allowing researchers to push boundaries, build collaborations, and work transparently. The International Brain Laboratory (IBL), a group of more than twenty labs working together to understand the neuroscience of decision-making, uses open-source software and other open science practices extensively to advance its research. Here, we interview two of the IBL's research software engineers to learn more about their career paths and how they view open-source development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Higher education faces growing calls to rethink traditional approaches to teaching, delivery, and assessment, driven by the evolving needs of modern learners. Today's students seek education that is flexible, personalized, and closely aligned with their career goals. Curricular flexibility supports learner-centered education, promotes adaptability, and empowers students by shifting some decision-making from faculty to learners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Health services research as a job market: A document analysis of job advertisements].

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes

September 2025

Universität Heidelberg, Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland; Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Electronic address:

Introduction: Since the mid-2010s, health services research (HSR) in Germany has been increasingly institutionalized. However, little is known about actual career paths within the field. The aim of this study was to describe the HSR job market in Germany, both in general terms and specifically for graduates of health services research master degree programs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There is an ongoing need to develop diverse career paths that support the vital contributions of staff scientists, research engineers, scientific officers, and other knowledge professionals in scientific discovery. Research infrastructures and core facilities have a particular need to support sustainable and diverse careers, as they either employ - if being a legal entity - or daily manage research professionals in a broad variety of roles to enable resources, services, and innovation.

Methods: In 2019, a survey of the facility staff at SciLifeLab, a large national research infrastructure in Sweden, led to a recommendation for universities to develop career paths for their staff scientists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF