Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of selective right paratracheal lymph node (RtPTLN) dissection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), focusing on oncologic outcomes.
Methods: This study included patients who underwent curative surgery for clinical stage I ESCC (cT1N0) at our institution between January 2010 and December 2021. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Among 1484 patients, 658 patients (mean age 63.1 ± 7.7 years) were identified and categorized into RtPTLN+ (dissection performed, n = 88) and RtPTLN- (no dissection, n = 570) groups. The groups were propensity score matched in a 1:2 ratios.
Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS, RtPTLN + vs. RtPTLN-, 75.8 % vs. 79.0 %, P = 0.38) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, 70.0 % vs. 72.5 %, P = 0.55) rates showed no significant differences. Propensity score matching yielded 248 patients: RtPTLN+ (n = 83) and RtPTLN- (n = 162). Post-matching, OS and RFS rates did not significantly differ between RtPTLN+ and RtPTLN- groups (OS: 77.2 % vs. 77.9 %, P = 0.94; RFS: 72.1 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.85). Subgroup analyses based on tumor location and depth (upper-middle/lower third and T1a/T1b) yielded consistent results. Multivariable analysis confirmed that RtPTLN dissection was not a significant predictor for OS or RFS.
Conclusion: In this propensity score-matched analysis, no significant difference in OS and RFS was observed between patients who underwent RtPTLN dissection and those who did not. These findings suggest that routine RtPTLN dissection may not be necessary and that selective dissection could be an acceptable approach in early-stage ESCC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110095 | DOI Listing |