A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Pathogenic germline variants in small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Pathogenic germline variants in small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

HGG Adv

Department of Medical Biophysics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Research Tower, 101 College Street, Room 9-309, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, 1 King's College Circle, Medical Sciences Building, R

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prevalence and clinical impact of germline variants in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Primary objectives included estimating the prevalence of germline variants in SCLC patients, while secondary objectives focused on their effects on patient outcomes. A comprehensive search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and gray-literature databases (as of July 2024). Studies reporting germline variants in SCLC patients were included. Data were extracted to calculate pooled prevalence and hazard ratios (HRs). Study quality was assessed using the Translating ROBBINs tool, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I statistic. Of 6,117 screened studies, 124 met inclusion criteria, with 8% (10/124) reporting pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) findings. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model estimated the prevalence of P/LP germline variants in SCLC patients at 11% (95% CI: 5%-25%). Gene-level prevalence was estimated for ATM (pooled prevalence = 1%; 95% CI: 0%-5%), BRCA1 (1%; 95% CI: 1%-3%), BRCA2 (1%; 95% CI: 1%-3%), and TP53 (1%; 95% CI: 0%-3%). Patients with P/LP variants in DNA damage repair genes showed a non-significant prognostic survival benefit (pooled HR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.51-1.29, I = 8%). We have conducted a comprehensive systematic review of germline variants and their impact on clinical outcomes of SCLC patients. Our meta-analysis identified an estimated prevalence of P/LP variants in SCLC patients, suggesting a rationale for screening in the clinic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144451PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100445DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

germline variants
24
sclc patients
20
variants sclc
16
systematic review
12
variants
8
variants small
8
small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
review meta-analysis
8

Similar Publications