Use of Noninvasive vs Invasive Ventilation for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Exacerbation of COPD, 2010 to 2019.

Am J Crit Care

Anuj B. Mehta is an associate professor in the Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, and in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority.

Published: May 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) contribute to morbidity and mortality. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV), a resource-intensive intervention, decreases mortality and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation.

Objective: To study NIV and mechanical ventilation use, NIV failure, and hospital NIV case volumes for inpatients with AECOPD from 2010 to 2019.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2010-2019) for adults (≥40 years old) hospitalized for AECOPD. Rates of NIV and mechanical ventilation use and NIV failure were compared per year. Multivariable hierarchical regression models were used. Hospital case volumes of NIV use (overall and for patients with AECOPD) were compared across years.

Results: Patients with AECOPD accounted for 3.35% of admissions in 2010 and 3.20% in 2019. Risk-adjusted rate (95% CI) of mechanical ventilation use decreased from 6.0% (5.6%-6.4%) to 4.5% (4.2%-4.8%); NIV use increased from 6.2% (5.6%-6.9%) to 10.9% (9.9%-12.0%). Noninvasive ventilation failure rate (95% CI) decreased from 7.8% (6.9%-8.7%) to 5.6% (5.0%-6.2%). Mean (SD) hospital case volume for NIV increased overall from 207.3 (237.0) in 2010 to 360.4 (447.4) in 2019 (P < .001); for patients with AECOPD, from 39.5 (37.8) to 79.0 (78.7) (P < .001).

Conclusions: From 2010 to 2019, mechanical ventilation use and NIV failure decreased; NIV use and hospital NIV case volumes increased. These results indicate greater need for monitored beds, equipment, and trained staff.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025261DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ventilation niv
16
mechanical ventilation
16
niv
12
niv failure
12
case volumes
12
patients aecopd
12
2010 2019
8
noninvasive ventilation
8
niv mechanical
8
hospital niv
8

Similar Publications

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options and significant variability in care. Racial and ethnic disparities in ALS management and outcomes have been reported, but findings remain inconsistent.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in ALS care, specifically differences in healthcare utilization, treatment patterns, and survival, within a large healthcare system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an established treatment for ADHF. : All consecutive patients admitted to Santa Croce Hospital of Cuneo, receiving CPAP for ADHF in the cath lab during PCI for AMI, were included in a case series.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction are at a high risk for postoperative respiratory complications, including hypoxemia. Conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may be poorly tolerated or contraindicated due to anatomical limitations. High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy represents a promising alternative, offering better humidification, comfort, and oxygenation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) often receive initial non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of NIV in patients hospitalized for AHF. This was a retrospective cohort study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, direct comparative evidence on the clinical efficacy of HFNC versus NIV in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) remains limited and inconclusive.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HFNC and NIV in AECOPD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF