A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effectiveness and Safety of Butyphthalide Injection in Treatment of Aphasia after Cerebral Infarction: A Meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of butylphthalide injection in the treatment of aphasia after cerebral infarction.

Methods: CNKI, Wanfang database, Duxiu, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Socolar databases were searched from the establishment of the database to August 2024. According to the topic of butylphthalide injection treated aphasia after cerebral infarction, the eligible RCT was selected and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and stata16 software. Two researchers independently screened the study, extracted the basic information in the study, and assessed the risk of bias in the study.

Results: A total of 1047 patients were included in 12 articles, including 524 patients in the experimental group (butylphthalide injection + conventional/special speech rehabilitation training) and 523 patients in the control group (conventional/special speech rehabilitation). The results of meta-analysis showed that the total clinical efficacy of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (RR=1.29, 95%CI: 1.17-1.43, Z=4.98, P < 0.0000). The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (conventional language rehabilitation training group: MD=-4.11,95%CI: -4.44~- 3.78, Z=24.38, P < 0.00001; special language rehabilitation training group: MD=-2.53, 95%CI: - 3.77 ~ -1.28, Z=3.97, P < 0.00001). Aphasia Quotient (AQ) scores of experimental groups were higher than those of control group (conventional language rehabilitation training group: MD=11.10, 95%CI: 10.26 ~ 11.94, Z=25.97, P<0.00001; special language rehabilitation training group: MD=5.23, 95%CI: 3.34~7.11, Z=5.44, P<0.00001); Adverse reactions: P>0.05, no statistical significance.

Conclusion: Butylphthalide injection is effective and safe in the treatment of aphasia after cerebral infarction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0113862073368524250313053657DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rehabilitation training
16
control group
16
aphasia cerebral
12
butylphthalide injection
12
experimental group
12
language rehabilitation
12
training group
12
group
10
injection treatment
8
treatment aphasia
8

Similar Publications