Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Determination of alpha emitter concentration is crucial for ensuring safety and compliance in radioactive waste disposal. This study uses gamma and alpha spectrometry to optimize gross alpha measurements for radioactive waste by selecting appropriate calibration curves. The lack of a priori knowledge about the compositions of alpha emitters often results in discrepancies between the gross alpha activities and the summed activities of all alpha emitters when a single mass efficiency curve, such as based on Am, is applied. We addressed this by revisiting gamma spectrometric data to categorize waste samples into uranium-major and the other groups, applying natural uranium calibration for the former and Am calibration for the latter. This approach corrected the underestimated gross alpha activities of the uranium-major samples and derived a better correlation between gross alpha activities and alpha activity sums from the alpha spectrometry.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111853 | DOI Listing |