98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The aim of this study was to explore perioperative and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with highly hostile abdomens treated with retroperitoneal (RP) single port vs transperitoneal multiport robot assisted partial nephrectomy.
Methods: Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated with transperitoneal multiport and RP single-port robot assisted partial nephrectomy between March 2019 and January 2024 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The presence of "hostile abdomen" was defined as personal history of at least one major abdominal surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta achievement.
Results: Overall, clinical and surgical data of 247 consecutive patients were prospectively collected, of these 71 met the inclusions criteria and were retrospectively analyzed. No differences emerged in baseline features. Previous surgery proximity to the site of partial nephrectomy was found comparable among groups (P=0.21). RP single port group showed a significantly lower operative time (171 vs. 235 min, P=0.02) and estimated blood loss (70 vs. 100 cc, P=0.04) while open conversion was significantly higher (9.3%) in case of multiport treatment (P=0.001). A significative lower rate of major postoperative complications (7.1% vs. 16.3%, P=0.03) as well as 90-days readmissions (P=0.04) was found in case of single port RP procedures. Adjusting for age, BMI and CCI, RP single port approach was confirmed as independent predictor of Trifecta achievement (OR 1.62 CI 1.18-2.35 P=0.01).
Conclusions: In patients treated with RAPN with highly hostile abdomens, the adoption of a single port RP approach reduces the major complication rate as compared to the multiport transperitoneal approach also improving EBL, operative time, LOS and pain management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06245-7 | DOI Listing |
Can Vet J
September 2025
Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1.
Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgical techniques are desirable in horses and other equids. A new approach called "modified single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for equine cryptorchidectomy" is described, along with the postoperative outcomes of 10 equids. A SILS Port device (Covidien) was placed a 30- to 40-millimeter incision in combination with 1 or 2 15-millimeter para-inguinal incisions to exteriorize the intra-abdominal testicles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAesthetic Plast Surg
September 2025
Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Giacomo Matteotti 42, 50132, Florence, Italy.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
September 2025
Jian-Zhao Yin Department of Gynecology and Wei-Feng Gao Department of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Background: The existing research data cannot fully prove the advantages of single-site Da Vinci robotic surgery (RSS) compared with single-site laparoscopic surgery (LESS) in the treatment of gynecological diseases.
Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost of RSS and LESS in the treatment of gynecological diseases. To provide a theoretical basis for RSS to replace LESS in the treatment of gynecological diseases.
Environ Sci Technol
September 2025
Baton Rouge Complex, ExxonMobil, Baton Rouge, 5955 Scenic Hwy, Louisiana 70805, United States.
Given the recent reduction in the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for annual PM from 12 to 9 μg m, the contribution of exceptional, though natural, particulate transport events has assumed greater regulatory relevance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vis Exp
August 2025
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University; Key Laboratory of Chongqing Health Commission for Minimally Invasive and Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer;
The integration of robotic platforms in breast oncology has witnessed substantial expansion, fueled by their inherent advantages in minimally invasive access and enhanced intraoperative maneuverability. Most of the robotic-assisted breast surgery has been performed using multi-arm robots. However, the implementation of single-port robotic (SPr) systems in mammary interventions continues to undergo rigorous clinical evaluation, particularly regarding long-term oncological safety and cost-effectiveness metrics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF