Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The heel pad is essential for cushioning and shock absorption during weight-bearing activities. Its thickness and integrity significantly impact foot health, particularly in diabetics at risk for ulcers due to neuropathy and vascular issues. This study examines heel pad thickness in diabetics and non-diabetics with normal BMI.
Materials And Methods: It was a case-control study conducted in the University Ultrasound Clinic, Green Town, Lahore. The duration of the study was 7 months. A convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data. The study was conducted after the approval from the research ethical committee at the University of Lahore. The sample size was 132, of which 66 were diabetic and 66 were normal. Both males and females aged 16-80 years with normal BMI were included in this study. The study found that diabetic individuals had significantly thicker heel pads than non-diabetics.
Results: For the left foot, the diabetic group had a mean thickness of 15.7 mm without compression and 12.4 mm with compression, versus 10.7 and 8.9 mm in the non-diabetic group. For the right foot, the diabetic group had mean thicknesses of 14.8 mm without compression and 12.6 mm with compression, compared to 10.8 and 9.2 mm in the non-diabetic group. All differences were statistically significant, with p values of 0.000.
Conclusion: Individuals with diabetes had significantly thicker heel pads than non-diabetics, both with and without compression. Females consistently had thicker heel pads than males across all conditions. Identifying changes in heel pad thickness may contribute to the early detection of foot-related diabetic complications, even in individuals with a normal BMI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24025 | DOI Listing |